Health care reform and welcome back students

Health care reform — another chimera?

Note: I wrote this Saturday, August 15th. When I got the papers Monday morning, front page articles splashed the news that President Obama might be willing to support a health reform plan without a public plan. It’s a huge change, but one that might make the legislation more palatable — or not. Saturday, it seemed that the whole thing was unraveling. So I wrote…

A lot of people all over the country are talking about what kind of health reform package we will have. I am an optimist on most things. When it comes to health reform, my optimism is shaded with deep concern. The igniting of extreme passions (illustrated by the appearance of guns at health reform rallies), especially on the part of anti-health care reformers, is causing me to worry that, yet again, health care reform will be just another chimera, a vision and dream deferred. Each time health care reform seems breathtakingly close, fear-mongering drowns out rational voices. I spent a few hours in the Atlanta airport last week and found myself speaking back to Lou Dobbs (on CNN) as he authoritatively spoke one mistruth after another about health reform. There was no one answering him but me — mostly under my breath.

The problems with our health care non-system have been catalogued — more than 47 million Americans uninsured, great disparities between those who are minority and those who are not, access problems, waste, geographic mal-distribution of health care, uneven quality of care, and health outcomes that, for many indicators, are worse in the US than in other countries. As Gawande, Berwick, Fisher and McClellan wrote in the New York Times August 13th, “So we are trying to decide if we are willing to change-willing to ensure that everyone can have coverage.” In 2009, we should conclude that we are willing to ensure that all Americans can have health care coverage.

There are many good analyses of the current bills. The bills have many common themes — guaranteed issue, administrative simplification, some but not all cover preventive services, transparent purchasing marketplace, minimum benefit package, individual mandates in some but not all plans, health care delivery reforms, workforce reform (includes public health), and allowable services dependent in part on comparative effectiveness. There’s a lot more, but these are some of the common elements. There’s no discussion of tort reform, but that needs to be fixed.

John Oberlander, PhD, Associate Professor of Health Policy and Management at our school, is one of the most astute commentators about health reform. Here are some links to his recent articles.

There’s no perfect system, but we can do better. We should do better.

Welcome back students!

I look forward to meeting our new students and talking with those who are returning. I love the fact that the sounds of students have begun to replace the sounds of silence in our atrium. Wishing you all a great year!

Happy Monday, Barbara


Featured Posts

  1. Sara Satinsky

    Will SPH provide additional opportunities on campus this year for students, staff, and faculty to become better informed about the health care debate and engage in conversation about it (e.g., through sponsoring speakers, workshops, discussions)? Are there related events in the works? Thanks!

  2. Thomas

    I agree with you. I have the same views which you have related to own Helath care.
    Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked*.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>